by Trevor Kirkendall
★
“The Equalizer” is yet another example of how Hollywood producers have either lost their creative mentality or just don’t care about finding original stories anymore. They’re out there, though. Studios continue to buy original concepts from writers, many of them first-time screenwriters. But where are these movies? The indie houses crank them out all the time, but they never make it to the big theaters.
★
“The Equalizer” is yet another example of how Hollywood producers have either lost their creative mentality or just don’t care about finding original stories anymore. They’re out there, though. Studios continue to buy original concepts from writers, many of them first-time screenwriters. But where are these movies? The indie houses crank them out all the time, but they never make it to the big theaters.
I have another theory though: Hollywood finds it easy to
regurgitate the same formula over and over again because they know you’re going to see it. The think
we – as an audience/consumer – are stupid. Everyone always says they’re sick
and tired of sequels, remakes, and reboots and that we demand originality. But
which ones do the best at the box office? “Godzilla” or “Pacific Rim?” Both are
the same movie, just one has a franchise title on it. Same rules apply here
with “The Equalizer.” Would anyone see this movie if it didn’t have the name of
widely successful TV series from the 80s? Probably not.
But I digress. “The Equalizer” stars Denzel Washington as
Robert McCall, a heavy lifter at the local Home Mart, a Home Depot/Lowes type
of store. No one really knows what he did before he began his job at Home Mart.
Every day, McCall comes to work, eats his healthy lunch, goes home, reads, and
never sleeps. Since he can never sleep, he spends many nights drinking tea at a
local diner near his home.
At the diner, he befriends a young escort named Teri (Chloë
Grace Moretz). She hates her job, but knows no other life. Turns out, she’s
been brought to the United States from her Russian home and forced into this
life. When her handlers brutally beat her within an inch of her life for
insubordination, McCall decides enough is enough and murders her Russian bosses
in their office. That’s enough for the big boss in Russia to send someone to
clean up the mess, a ruthless one-dimensional villain named Teddy (Marton
Csokas).
This is a big screen television adaptation in name only.
Other than calling the main character Robert McCall, and a little homage to the
series right before the closing credits, there is nothing about this film that
remotely resembles the original series. Now, that’s not necessarily a bad
thing, but the story doesn’t hold up well at all. I can look the other way on
the whole “adapted-from-a-television-series” thing, but a half-assed, cliché littered
screenplay cannot be overlooked.
.jpg)
Director Antoine Fuqua continues to prove himself as an
inept storyteller. Aside from “Training Day,” which is mediocre at best, Fuqua
only concerns himself with staging action sequences and concocting moments of
cheap thrills. For “The Equalizer,” Fuqua delivers nothing new. In fact, he
pulls out all the tricks in the book to make this film full of every crime film
cliché we’ve seen since the dawn of the genre. He directs his focus to setting
up brutally violent sequences rather than finding things for the audience to
empathize with and gain some form of a rooting interest. Not that the script
from Richard Wenk (“The Expendables 2”) had much there to begin with. Fuqua’s
cast receives no favors either.
-large-picture.jpg)
For a film about brutal revenge killings, I suppose “The
Equalizer” could be considered decent. But fans of the 80s television series
will be supremely disappointed when they see someone masquerading around as
Robert McCall not acting like the Robert McCall they all know and love. This is
a cheap and blatant attempt by a Hollywood studio to capitalize on its own
history again by slapping the name of a once successful series and trying to
market it as something new and fresh. We shouldn’t be so easily fooled by this,
but I have a feeling this film will do well and will no doubt produce some kind
of sequel, or worse, a long running franchise. That’s just what we need: more
vapid and uninspired garbage from studios only interested in repackaging the
same exact thing you’ve seen over and over and over for the last decade or two.