by Trevor Kirkendall
It’s no surprise that Hollywood studios seem to have a
shortage of original ideas lately. They continue to remake successful movies
from previous decades and give sequels to films that don’t deserve it. And
would you believe that they’re running out of movies to remake? When the remake
pool starts to dry, they look to foreign language films that the American
public hasn’t seen and doesn’t know about. One such remake is “Starbuck”, an
award winning film from Canada that has been remade (by its original director)
into “Delivery Man”, a starring vehicle for Vince Vaughn. Despite the source material
being from a different country, the results are still the same.
David Wozniak (Vince Vaughn) is a self described incompetent
delivery truck driver. He works with his father Mikolaj (Andrzej Blumenfeld)
and his brothers Victor (Simon Delaney) and Aleksy (Bobby Moynihan) at a family
run meat shop in New York City. He’s in a massive amount of debt to the mob or
something (it’s never really fully explained; they just pop up whenever the
plot needs them to cause a disturbance). He’s in a relationship with a police
officer, Emma (Cobie Sumlders), that doesn’t seem to be going anywhere. Then
she springs the news on him that she’s pregnant. Emma will allow David to be
the baby’s father if he straightens up his act.
David thinks he’s ready to be a dad, but he’s not sure.
Suddenly he’s blindsided with a visit by an attorney for a fertility clinic
where he donated sperm around 20 years ago. He donated almost 700 times in a
four year time span. The clinic mistakenly gave his specimens to everyone who
passed through. Therefore, he’s the biological father of 533 kids, 142 of whom
are suing the clinic to find out his identity. He donated anonymously under the
name Starbuck, so these kids don’t know who he is. The clinic’s attorney leaves
him a sealed envelope containing profiles of all 142 kids.
David’s best friend, and non-practicing attorney, Brett
(Chris Pratt) advises him to fight this so that he can remain anonymous. Brett
also tells David not to look inside the envelope. David does anyway and starts
tracking these kids down. One is a barista aspiring to be an actor (Jack
Reynor), one is a street musician (Dave Patten) and one is heroin addict trying
to turn her life around (Britt Robertson). Then there’s Viggo (Adam
Chanler-Berat) who sees David hanging around all these kids and figures out who
he is.
“Delivery Man” is 103 minutes of one awkward situation after
another and none of it is satisfying, enjoyable or humorous. In fact, many
moments are downright painful. You know those awkward moments I’m talking
about; the ones that form the basic plot structure of just about every sitcom
on television. You have a guy standing there in the middle of the room
surrounded by people he’s been lying to for the entire episode. Now he has to
talk his way out of the lies he’s told to them, but everything he says
contradicts something he said earlier. The people press him for more
information and he becomes visibly distraught until he buckles under pressure. Sure,
you laugh because it’s awkward, not because it’s funny. You’re left with that
knot in your stomach because you’ve been in a similar situation, just not as
embellished. But the episode is only 20 minutes and easily forgettable. But “Delivery
Man” leaves you with that awkward situation for almost the entire duration. That’s
five sitcoms back-to-back.
To be fair, the screenplay does offer up a few moments of
relief that bring the film into a more dramatic tone. David does go through
some soul searching and grows up in the process. His growth is forced and not
genuine. A lot of it happens due to coincidence which is a cheap ploy to move
the story along. At least he does change, which is what you want to see.
Writer/director Ken Scott adapted this film from his original movie “Starbuck”
which I never saw. But I have to assume it’s not filled with the typical
Hollywood clichés that flood this version. Take out all the generic things you’ve come to
expect from a typical comedy and this might have been decent.
I’ll give some credit to Vince Vaughn. He plays this role a
little differently than his typical comedic roles. He doesn’t act so neurotic
and high strung at all times, and his dialogue is clear and slow rather than
that high speed stutter he’s known for. Sure, he slides into it from time to
time, but he doesn’t base his entire character on that. Had he played it like
that, he would have come across as the typical “Swingers” Vince Vaughn which
has already worn out its welcome. Here, he actually plays into the more complex
subtexts and brings out a genuine character. He’s done a couple dramatic roles
before (like his small role in Sean Penn’s masterful “Into the Wild”) so I know
he’s capable of finding a character. It doesn’t surprise me he pulled this off.
Unfortunately, “Delivery Man” is a mess from beginning to
end, littered with coincidence and clichés that destroy almost every movie that
comes out of a Hollywood studio’s story department. The story here is good, but
it just seems like it was dumbed down
for mainstream viewing. It seems like it was tailor made to fit Vaughn’s
shtick, and then he didn’t even play it that way. I’d like to think the
moviegoing public doesn’t need simplified plot lines to be understood or to be
relatable. Apparently Hollywood disagrees with me since they keep releasing these
cliché riddled movies week in and week out.
