Review: Wish I Was Here

by Trevor Kirkendall

★★★★

We all know how great of a film “Garden State” is and how talented Zach Braff is as a writer and director. I wasn’t expecting much from “Garden State” when it first came out ten years ago (yes, it has been that long), but it became one of my favorite films of the year and of the decade. But it took ten years for Braff to follow that up with his second feature film “Wish I Was Here” and I’m not sure why. Every studio passed on this script. It wasn’t until Braff took his wishes to the crowd funding website Kickstarter that he was finally able to make the film on his own. And after seeing it, I can’t understand why studios passed on this one.

Braff has said this film was meant to be a “spiritual sequel” or sorts to “Garden State” and I can see that. Braff plays Aidan Bloom, a mid-30s actor struggling to find work. His wife Sarah (Kate Hudson) is left to provide for the whole family, which also includes their children Grace (Joey King) and Tucker (Pierce Gagnon). The kids are enrolled at a private Orthodox Jewish school, a request from Aidan’s father Gabe (Mandy Patinkin) who pays the pricey tuition.

But then Gabe reveals to Aidan that he has cancer and would like to take part in an experimental treatment, which will cost him the rest of his life savings. That means no more school tuition for the kids. So Aidan pulls them from the school and opts to try his hand at homeschooling. But when Gabe’s cancer experiment fails, Aidan is left to watch his father – a man who he’s never really seen eye-to-eye with – slowly fade away. That causes him to question some of his life choices and also how he’s seen in the eyes of his children. He also tries to bring his estranged brother Noah (Josh Gad) back into the family mix, especially for the sake of his dying father.

It sounds a lot more melodramatic that it really is. It’s mostly lighthearted and humorous in Braff’s unique brand of filmmaking. Overall, “Wish I Was Here” is very comparable in tone to “Garden State.” There are many moments that will really make you laugh out loud, moments that really warm your heart, and moments that will truly move your emotions.

Braff calling this film a spiritual sequel is reasonably accurate. It wouldn’t be a stretch to put Braff’s Andrew Largeman in the role of Aidan and Natalie Portman’s Sam in for Sarah, picking back up with them ten years or so after “Garden State” ends. Married with kids in Los Angeles, Largeman struggling to find work, his estranged father lying on his deathbed. It all works. But Braff wants to prove he’s a serious writer and director, which is why he chose to create completely different characters.

Braff’s Aidan is no Largeman and Hudson’s Sarah is no Sam. They’re vastly different from the people we knew in “Garden State.” Braff’s screenplay – which he co-wrote with his brother Adam – is just as solid as his last effort. But he’s grown up in the last ten years and no doubt experienced much more of life than he had when he did “Garden State.” “Wish I Was Here” is a more mature writing effort for Braff.

As a director, Braff understands the emotions he’s trying to convey from his screenplay. He’s able to make this film wear its emotions on its proverbial sleeves. Personally, there were things going on in my life at the time of “Garden State’s” release that affected me on a deep level when I first saw it. The same thing applies for me, personally, with “Wish I Was Here” ten years later. The ability to make that personal connection with your audience is really what separates the good directors from the great ones. And Braff is on his way to being great.

The film is full of great performances from Braff and Hudson and their young co-stars. But the performance from Patinkin could very well be a defining role of his career. Most will remember him for Inigo Montoya, but this really shows his range more than anything else I’ve ever seen him in. Movies like this only work when all those involved comes together in the most perfect of circumstances. Patinkin is what pushes this film over the edge to make it great.

Much like “Garden State” before it, Braff’s “Wish I Was Here” will probably go down as one of my favorite movies of the year, and will likely be a contender for my Best Ten at year’s end. This film has so many great elements that it’s hard to isolate the ones that work the best. Too many people have criticized Braff for not branching out further from “Garden State” with his second feature. I disagree. Sure he might have stayed close to home, but it works. It worked great in 2004 and it works well today. And there are enough differences here to separate the two films to make each stand distinctly on their own.

Review: Wish I Was Here

by. Joe Moss
★★★★

Why on Earth did all of Hollywood refuse to back such a scintillating film as Zach Braff's sophomore release? Maybe they couldn't handle the stark clarity with which he dealt with family, religion, death, and growing up; whatever the reason, their loss--his gain. "Wish I Was Here" has managed to surpass the respect I held for his freshman offering "Garden State" (which I loved dearly) by forcing me to deal with memories of my own family even as the script played before my eyes.

Aidan Bloom (Braff) is a struggling actor with a real problem--he hasn't been able to land a gig in years, the last being a dandruff commercial. His father, Gabe (Mandy Patinkin) is sick and may be dying. His brother, Noah (Josh Gad) is a genius recluse who refuses to talk to any member of his family other than Aidan. His wife, Sarah (Kate Hudson), the sole bread-winner for the family, is being sexually harassed at work and told by her bosses to "relax and be more fun;" and his children, Grace and Tucker (Joey King and Pierce Gagnon) are in danger of being thrown out of their private Jewish schooling due lack of payment by Gabe as he spends the money on his mounting medical bills. Aidan just cannot catch a break.

As this poignant look at life in suburban California plays on, the audience cannot help but be drawn into this plight of 'every man.'  We can all relate to the struggles of paying bills, and working dead-end jobs, and putting up with harassment of all types...simply because we have no choice. The American Dream is a tough reality to maintain for many of us working schmucks. The ending of the film is about as close to reality as you would expect--and I do not think it was a surprise ending...much in the reverse, it was the ending that we, as the audience, had rooted for. The most memorable line of the film to me was stated by Aidan in the few minutes, "My brother and I had always thought of ourselves as the hero, when maybe it was we who needed to be saved."

The script was so wonderfully written by Zach and his brother, Adam. I cannot help but feel the story was pulled from their own lives. There is too much raw emotion portrayed within the film to be anything but. Zach and Kate have a magnanimous chemistry that translates beautifully on screen--you truly feel they are married and struggling together...not as separate people ponderously dredging through the quicksand of life. Kate Hudson's innate ability to bring positive energy into every scene helps elevate Braff's natural, brooding sarcasm into the stratosphere. Additionally, Mandy Patinkin has Braff's father is so spot on (and they look so similarly) that I wonder if Zach didn't have moments of hallucination back to his own childhood during filming.

Sundance did not disappoint when it announced how the audience so favorably responded to this film. I am so over the moon about this film, that I cannot express enough the whys and how quickly everyone should go to see it. If you are in the mood for a heart wrenching, true-to-life drama that transcends to address many of the social issues of today...look no further.

Review: Jobs

by Trevor Kirkendall

★★

A man sitting next to me in a screening of “Jobs” was moved to such boredom that he took out his iPhone in the middle of the film to check in on his various social media sites. I wonder what Steve Jobs would say about that. I don’t think he ever envisioned someone would be watching a movie about his life and would become so bored that they would have to turn to their iPhone. Unfortunately, that’s what “Jobs” is : a tedious bore that will make you want to turn to any number of Apple or Apple-inspired products to keep you awake.

We all know Steve Jobs already. Almost all of you are probably reading this review on something Jobs designed (if you’re on a desktop, you’ve got your mouse; if you’re on a Smartphone, our website statistics suggest its probably an iPhone). What “Jobs” attempts to show us is the personal side of the man, and how he built a computer company from his adopted parents’ garage.

We begin with Steve Jobs (Ashton Kutcher) dropping out of Reed College in the mid-1970s. We see his interest in the calligraphy classes he continued to audit. We see him travel to India with his friend Daniel Kottke (Lukas Haas). He eventually finds himself working for Atari helping to design games. With the help of his best friend Steve ‘Woz’ Wozniak (Josh Gad), the two design a great game for Atari called “Breakout”.

One day while hanging out with Woz, Jobs discovers a computer motherboard Woz has been working on that connects to the television. With Jobs’ insistence, the two decide to market the motherboard under the name Apple Computer. Soon, they’re given an investment from Mike Murkkula (Dermot Mulroney) to help pay for the mass production of what will become the Apple II. What follows is pretty much common knowledge within the world of business and technology. The film moves along up until the late 1990s.

That’s twenty years of time covered in 122 minutes. We’ve seen this time span covered before in other films, but in “Jobs”, the pacing is so painstakingly slow that it feels like they could have easily made it to the release of the iPad in the late 2000s. The film meanders with no guidance or direction, and feels more like a cheaply made TV movie.

This is not, however, a knock on the performance given by Kutcher. He’s done some drama roles here and there before taking on “Jobs”, but I think this is the first serious role he’s had. He turns in a truly fantastic performance. I’m not so certain this is exactly what Jobs was really like or not. I’ve heard that Jobs was so intimidating that Apple employees wouldn’t even get on an elevator with him when the doors opened and he was standing in there. That’s power based on fear. Kutcher portrays Jobs as a driven and determined individual. He shows a few fits of rage that Jobs was known for, but overall Kutcher portrays him as a man with such determination that he always seems to be on the verge of tears.

As for his best friend Woz, comedic actor Josh Gad turns in an equally impressive performance. Gad is probably most well known for his most recent appearance as a series regular on the short lived series “1600 Penn” and also as an original cast member on the Boradway musical “The Book of Mormon”. He can now add to his resume that he’s also a proficient dramatic actor as well. Occasionally he provides the comic relief, but for the most part he plays the part very well. The scenes featuring only him and Kutcher are some of the best in the film.

The performances can only go as far as the script allows them, and unfortunately the screenplay isn’t really worth a whole lot. Written by first timer Matt Whiteley, the screenplay lacks any direction or overall vision. There’s no story being told here. It flows out like a documentary with no story structure at all. We’re taken from one well known episode of Jobs’ career to the next without any guidance. I wish I could give Whiteley a pass for being a first time screenwriter, but I can’t. Jobs led an interesting life but according to this film, his life must have been pretty boring.

He highlights Jobs’ drive and passion, but we never really see what it is that drives him. The desire to be the first and to be innovative maybe, but that doesn’t ever sink in to the film. Anyone who has done a little reading on Jobs (I have, as I am not afraid to admit my Apple admiration and addiction) probably knows his drive is based on making the best products out there; being at the crossroads of technology and innovation. But where did this come from? We’re treated to a sequence of Jobs tripping on LSD, and then suddenly he’s criticizing how the individual circuits on the board are a little lopsided. The screenplay just assumes we know he’s attentive to detail, and asks us to accept that this is the way it is. Walter Isaacson wrote an immense biography on Jobs shortly before his death in 2011. I’m sure there’s a wealth of information that could have been gained from that unprecedented access behind shroud of secrecy that was Jobs’ life. But it appears Whiteley didn’t want to do the research into Jobs’ life, only the life of the company he created.

Director Joshua Michael Stern couldn’t even save the film from its dry script. He plugs the audience along on this two hour journey about as quickly as the original Macintosh 128k renders graphics. It makes me realize that the only reason this film was made was to show off how much Kutcher resembles Steve Jobs. Showcasing how much he’s grown as an actor seems to be a fringe benefit. Stern has seemed to let the script direct him instead of the other way around. That never ends well, as evident here.

While “Jobs” isn’t a complete disaster – thanks to the wonderful acting – it is by no means a great film. There are plenty of fascinating documentaries available that move along at a much more brisk pace than this. This felt rushed. The man has only been deceased for less than two years, and we already have a biopic about him. Another movie about Jobs is in the works which is being scripted by Aaron Sorkin. I think that might be the definitive Steve Jobs film. It’ll at least move fast. Unlike this unimaginative bore. A movie about Steve Jobs shouldn’t be unimaginative, unoriginal or boring. These are three words exactly zero people on this planet would use to describe Steve Jobs.