by Trevor Kirkendall
Everyone’s always after that next big book franchise. With so many successful book series turned into hit movies, studios are trying to jump on the next big thing. They’re wise to be looking at the teen and young adult novels, since those are the ones that seem to do so well. A series on the MGB in Stalin-era Soviet Union? That might be a little hard to sell. Such is the case with “Child 44," which is based on a the first novel in a series by Tom Rob Smith.
★
Everyone’s always after that next big book franchise. With so many successful book series turned into hit movies, studios are trying to jump on the next big thing. They’re wise to be looking at the teen and young adult novels, since those are the ones that seem to do so well. A series on the MGB in Stalin-era Soviet Union? That might be a little hard to sell. Such is the case with “Child 44," which is based on a the first novel in a series by Tom Rob Smith.
Rapidly rising star Tom Hardy stars a Leo Demidov, a Soviet
war hero during World War II and member of the Soviet MGB (the Ministry for
State Security, precursor of the more infamous KGB). During this Cold War era,
the Soviet Union prided itself on having no crime within its Communist state.
“There’s no murder in paradise,” they say quite often. Even with a serial
killer on the loose, the state chooses to ignore it and not publicly address
it. Yet day after day, dead boys appear along train tracks throughout the
county, and they keep getting listed as accidental deaths.
Leo doesn't believe this, though; especially after the son
of his friend Alexei (Fares Fares) is found dead. But no one in the state wants
to admit that these deaths are because of murder. Meanwhile, Leo is told that his
wife Raisa (Noomi Rapace) may be a spy for the west. Leo has the
opportunity to turn on her, but instead stands by her side. They’re run out of
town by Leo’s protégé Vasili (Joel Kinnaman) and sent to the abysmal Volsk
where he works alongside General Nesterov (Gary Oldman). There, Leo continues
to track down the perpetrator of these grisly murders behind the back of the
MGB’s ever-watchful eye and Nesterov, who doesn't want to have any part in this
crazy investigation.
The overly dense plot of “Child 44” is probably much better
served as prose rather than a film. To cut down all the details pertaining to
the inner workings of the Soviet secret police and put it into a film that’s
just shy of two-and-a-half hours is pretty much impossible. And given how
poorly put together this film is, that point is proven correct. Could you
imagine if each book in the popular “A Song of Ice and Fire” series was made
into one movie?
There’s a lot wrong with “Child 44,” but the lack of regard
toward the film’s direction is the most sinful. What is this film trying to be?
At times it seems to want to be a serial killer procedural. Other times, it
feels like an anti-Soviet film. That, of course, makes it feel horrendously
outdated since the Soviet Union doesn't actually exist anymore. Director Daniel
Espinosa (“Safe House”) doesn't seem to know the script is weighted down by dead
weight. This may be a faithful adaptation of the novel, but I’m sure each and
every scene didn't have to be in here like this. The film is way too long as it
is. A few simple cuts here and there wouldn't have hurt.
Hardy’s Leo is the only positive thing worth mentioning, if
you can get over his goofy Russian accent. The book no doubt provides an
enormous amount of character development to this character. Being the
exceptionally polished performer that he is, I’m sure Hardy read the novel and
based his character around that rather than what was written in the script.
He’s fine here and I have no problems with him; however, the supporting roles are so
undefined that the actors have resorted to all the stereotypical clichés that
infect so many other films. Especially Kinnaman, who parades around his
co-stars with same arrogant strut he had on the TV series “The Killing,” coupled with an
atrocious accent as well. Vasili is a flat character encompassing every cop-drama
villain cliché imaginable. Just a little more attention to character development
would have gone a long way. Again, I’m sure the novel addresses this, but the
film does not.
“Child 44” could very well be a faithful page-to-screen
adaptation, but the movie by itself can barely stand on its own. I’m sure
something this complex would be better suited for a television season rather
than a movie. If the goal was to appease the fans of the book with a faithful
adaptation, then they may have accomplished the goal. But pandering to one
small demographic like that isn't enough to build the foundation a film franchise. There
are two more books in this series. If they do make them, maybe it will be a
Netflix Original Series. That’s probably the best possible medium for a story
like this. But this doesn't have any business being in a theater.
No comments:
Post a Comment